|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]徐开达,王好学,姜亚洲,等.3种日本黄姑鱼放流标志方法的比较[J].厦门大学学报(自然科学版),2018,57(03):363-368.[doi:10.6043/j.issn.0438-0479.201709015]
 XU Kaida,WANG Haoxue,JIANG Yazhou,et al.Comparison of Three Tagging Methods for the Release of Nibea japonica[J].Journal of Xiamen University(Natural Science),2018,57(03):363-368.[doi:10.6043/j.issn.0438-0479.201709015]
点击复制

3种日本黄姑鱼放流标志方法的比较(PDF/HTML)
分享到:

《厦门大学学报(自然科学版)》[ISSN:0438-0479/CN:35-1070/N]

卷:
57卷
期数:
2018年03期
页码:
363-368
栏目:
研究论文
出版日期:
2018-05-31

文章信息/Info

Title:
Comparison of Three Tagging Methods for the Release of Nibea japonica
文章编号:
0438-0479(2018)03-0363-06
作者:
徐开达1王好学1姜亚洲2胡翠林1王忠明1卢占晖1朱文斌1柴学军1周永东1*
1.浙江省海洋水产研究所,农业部重点渔场渔业资源科学观测实验站,浙江省海洋渔业资源可持续利用技术研究重点实验室,浙江 舟山 316021; 2.中国水产科学研究院东海水产研究所,上海 200090
Author(s):
XU Kaida1WANG Haoxue1JIANG Yazhou2HU Cuilin1WANG Zhongming1LU Zhanhui1ZHU Wenbin1CHAI Xuejun1ZHOU Yongdong1*
1.Scientific Observing and Experimental Station of Fishery Resources for Key Fishing Grounds,Key Laboratory of Sustainable Utilization of Technology Research for Fisheries Resources of Zhejiang Province,Ministry of Agriculture,Marine Fisheries Research
关键词:
日本黄姑鱼 挂牌标志 金属线码标志 切腹鳍标志
Keywords:
Nibea japonica H-bar tagging coded wire tagging ventral sundering tagging
分类号:
S 931.9
DOI:
10.6043/j.issn.0438-0479.201709015
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
采用挂牌、金属线码和切腹鳍3种标志方法对大规格(平均体长(10.3±0.6)cm)和小规格(平均体长(6.8±0.5)cm)的日本黄姑鱼(Nibea japonica)进行标志实验.14 d室内暂养实验结果表明:3种标志方法对日本黄姑鱼平均成活率影响不大; 而挂牌标志组标志成功率显著低于其他各组(p<0.05),且其中大规格组标志成功率显著高于小规格组(p<0.05).除肝体比外,标志鱼的主要生长指标受标志方法影响均极显著(p<0.01); 饵料转换效率和脏体比受标志鱼体规格影响极显著(p<0.01); 标志方法和鱼体规格的交互作用对脏体比影响显著(p<0.05),对饵料转换效率和肝体比影响极显著(p<0.01).3种标志方法中挂牌标志组的多项生长指标与对照组差异显著(p<0.05),金属线码标志组的饵料转换效率和切腹鳍标志组的脏体比与对照组差异显著(p<0.05),其他生长指标无显著差异.综合分析得出:切腹鳍可用于短期标志,金属线码标志对鱼体生长影响较小,当日本黄姑鱼体长大于10.0 cm时可采用挂牌标志法以提高标志鱼回捕率.
Abstract:
The tagging experiments were conducted on large(average length of(10.3±0.6)cm)and small(average length of(6.8±0.5)cm)Nibea japonica with three fish-tagging methods,i.e.H-bar tagging,coded wire tagging,and ventral sundering tagging.After a fortnight temporary rearing experiment,the result was as follows:all the three fish-tagging made no significant difference on the survival rate,and the success rate of tagging large group was evidently higher than that of tagging small group(p<0.05),but the success rate of H-bar tagging group was significantly lower than that of the other two groups(p<0.05).In addition to the liver to body weight ratio,different tagging methods significantly affected tagged fishes’ primary growth indexes(p<0.01).Likewise,the forage conversion efficiency and the organ to body weight ratio were extremely influenced by the size of N. japonica(p<0.01).The interaction between these two factors significantly affected the organ to body ratio(p<0.05),and extremely influenced the forage conversion efficiency and the liver to body weight ratio(p<0.01).Compared to the control group,the H-bar tagging group showed significant differences in various growth indexes(p<0.05),while the coded wire tagging group and ventral sundering tagging group only showed significant differences in the forage conversion efficiency and the organ to body weight ratio(p<0.05),respectively.Accordingly,it is recommended that the ventral sundering tagging method is applicable for a short time tagging,and the coded wire tagging method has small effect on the growth of fish.As for N. japonica,when the body length is greater than 10.0 cm,it is suggested to adopt the H-bar tagging method in order to increase the recapturing rate.

参考文献/References:

[1] 程家骅,姜亚洲.海洋生物资源增殖放流回顾与展望[J].中国水产科学,2010,17(3):610-617.
[2] BARTLEY D M,BELL J D.Restocking,stock enhancement and sea ranching:arenas of progress[J].Reviews in Fisheries Science,2008,16(1/2/3):357-365.
[3] KAI L,LEBER K M,BLANKENSHIP H L.Responsible approach to marine stock enhancement:an update[J].American Fisheries Society,1995,15:167-175.
[4] 陈锦淘,戴小杰.鱼类标志放流技术的研究现状[J].上海水产大学学报,2005,14(4):451-456.
[5] 洪波,孙振中.标志放流技术在渔业中的应用现状及发展前景[J].水产科技情报,2006,33(2):73-76.
[6] SáNCHEZ-LAMADRID A.Effectiveness of four methods for tagging juveniles of farm-reared gilthead sea bream,Sparus aurata L.[J].Fisheries Management and Ecology,2001,8(3):271-278.
[7] CROZIER W W,KENNEDY G J A.Impact of tagging with coded wire tags on marine survival of wild Atlantic salmon(Salmo salar L.)migrating from the R.Bush,Northern Ireland[J].Fish Res,2002,59(1/2):209-215.
[8] TANAKA M,SEIKAI T,YAMAMOTO E,et al.Effects of T-bar and DST tagging on survival and growth of European hake[J].Review:Methods and Technologies in Fish Biology and Fisheries,2009,9:181-193.
[9] 孙忠,余方平,王跃斌.鮸鱼增殖放流标志技术的初步研究[J].海洋渔业,2007,29(4):344-348.
[10] 徐开达,周永东,王伟定,等.舟山海域黑鲷标志放流试验[J].上海海洋大学学报,2008,17(1):93-97.
[11] 薄治礼,周婉霞.浙江省沈家门沿岸水域石斑鱼幼鱼标志放流与重捕试验[J].水产学报,1999,23(3):304-307.
[12] 马晓林,周永东,徐开达,等.浙江沿岸大黄鱼标志放流及回捕率调查研究[J].浙江海洋学院学报(自然科学版),2016,35(1):24-29.
[13] 柳学周,徐永江,陈学周,等.半滑舌鳎苗种体外挂牌标志技术研究[J].海洋科学进展,2013,31(2):273-277.
[14] 朱元鼎,张春霖,成庆泰.东海鱼类志[M].北京:科学出版社,1963:277-288.
[15] 楼宝,徐君卓,吴祖杰,等.日本黄姑鱼养殖试验初报[J].上海水产大学学报,2002,11(4):324-328.
[16] 柴学军,徐君卓,吴祖杰.日本黄姑鱼全人工繁育技术研究[J].浙江海洋学院学报(自然科学版),2007,26(2):168-172.
[17] 王波,张锡烈,曲秀家,等.日本黄姑鱼的生物学特性及苗种生产技术[J].海洋水产研究,2002,23(4):13-19.
[18] DAVIS T L O,REID D D.Estimates of tag-shedding rates for Floy FT-2 dart and FD-67 anchor tags in barramundi Lates calcarifer Bloch[J].Aust J Freshw Res,2008,33(6):1113-1117.
[19] NIELSEN L A.Methods of marking fish and shellfish[M].NewYork:American Fisheries Society,1992:74-81.
[20] WALDMAN J R,DUNNING D J,MATTSON M T.A morphological explanation for size-dependent anchor tag loss from striped bass[J].Trans Am Soc,1990,119:920-923.
[21] OTTER? H,KRISTIANSEN T S,SV?SAND T.Eva-luation of anchor tags used in sea-ranching experiments with atlantic cod(Gadus morhua L.)[J].Fisheries Research,1998,35:237-246.
[22] MUSTAFA S.Stock enhancement and sea ranching:objectives and potential[J].Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries,2003,13(2):141-149.
[23] 王正鲲,赵天,林小涛,等.茜素络合物对唐鱼耳石标记效果以及生长和存活率的影响[J].生态学杂志,2015,34(1):189-194.
[24] 刘骁,谢晶,黄硕琳.鱼类保活运输的研究进展[J].食品与发酵工业,2015,41(8):255-260.
[25] 韩书煜,邹建伟,陈剑锋,等.人工增殖放流石斑鱼类的标识技术研究[J].现代渔业信息,2010,25(3):12-17.
[26] 史会来,楼宝,骆季安,等.不同投饲率对日本黄姑鱼幼鱼生长及鱼体生化成分的影响[J].海洋渔业,2007,29(1):53-56.
[27] 楼宝,史会来,骆季安,等.饥饿和再投喂对日本黄姑鱼代谢率和消化器官组织学的影响[J].海洋渔业,2007,29(2):140-147.
[28] HALLS A S,AZM M E.The utility of visible implant(Ⅵ)tags for marking tropical river fish[J].Fisheries Management and Ecology,1998,5(1):71-80.
[29] HEARD R W.Overview of salmon stock enhancement in southeast Alaska and compatibility with maintenance of hatchery and wild stocks[J].Environmental Biology of Fishes,2012,94(1):273-283.
[30] 杨德国,危起伟,王凯,等.人工标志放流中华鲟幼鱼的降河洄游[J].水生生物学报,2005,29(1):26-30.
[31] HAMASAKI K,OBATA Y,DAN S.A review of seed production and stock enhancement for commercially important portunid crabs in Japan[J].Aquaculture International,2010,19(2):217-235.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2017-09-15 录用日期:2018-01-17
基金项目:科技部国际科技合作与交流专项(2015DFR30450); 公益性行业(农业)科研专项(20130347); 浙江省自然科学基金(LY17C190006); 浙江省科技厅项目(2016F30018,2017C32031); 国家海洋局公益性行业科研专项(201505025)
*通信作者:19479934@qq.com
引文格式:徐开达,王好学,姜亚洲,等.3种日本黄姑鱼放流标志方法的比较[J].厦门大学学报(自然科学版),2018,57(3):363-368.
Citation:XU K D,WANG H X,JIANG Y Z,et al.Comparison of three tagging methods for the release of Nibea japonica[J].J Xiamen Univ Nat Sci,2018,57(3):363-368.(in Chinese)
更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01